DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
TAL
Docket No: 10030-12
5 December 2012
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United
States Code, section 1552...
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 28 November 2012. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the
Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters
Marine Corps, a COpy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this regard, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The Board also noted that you are entitled to submit the attached
Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the
Armed Forces of the United States (DD Form 293) to the Naval
Council of Personnel Review Boards, Attention: Naval Discharge
Review Board (NDRB), 720 Kennon Street, SE, Room 309, Washington
Navy Yard, Washington, DC 20375-5023, for consideration of an
upgrade of your discharge and a change in your narrative reason
for discharge.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or othe
In this regard,
presumption ©
Consequently,
record, the b
existence of
Enclosures
r matter not prev
f regularity attac
when applying for
urden is on the appli
probable material erro
iously considered b
it is important to keep in
hes to all official records.
y the Board.
mind that a
f an official naval
r or injustice.
Ly
W. DEAN P
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07307-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR876 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Because of a civil court case Secretary of the Navy was directed to reconsider his decision made in the Records (BCNR) to consider your case regarding your forced retirement per the FY09 Colonel SRB. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04241-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 January 2012. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03400-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 12876 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an etre 2. naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00953-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 00 CRSDocket No: 953-07 27 March 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Record s, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02885-03
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statute ;, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04500 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Records show that in April 1999, your husband was notified by the attached letter (enclosure 2) that he had completed all of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7538 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00960-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a corrvtion of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...